Repository navigation
refactor(id): require canonical decimal request IDs - #804
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Summary: Intent: - Retire the temporary ID comparison workaround from #778 now that the decimal-ID rollout is complete. Changes: - Compare resource IDs numerically using only canonical positive decimal IDs; reject legacy prefixed IDs. - Update the comparison contracts and replace rollout compatibility tests with rejection coverage, including ingestion and bookmark behavior. --- <sub>Generated by the 🪄 [pr-create](https://sg.uberinternal.com/code.uber.internal/uber-code/devexp-agent-marketplace/-/blob/claude-code/plugins/dev/uber-dev/skills/pr-create/SKILL.md) skill in devexp-agent-marketplace</sub>
mnoah1
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 7, 2026 18:49
mnoah1
requested review from
a team,
behinddwalls and
sbalabanov
as code owners
October 7, 2026 18:49
behinddwalls
approved these changes
Oct 7, 2026
behinddwalls
temporarily deployed
to
stack-rebase
October 7, 2026 21:45 — with 
GitHub Actions
Inactive
GitHub Actions
Inactive
behinddwalls
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2026
…n's design ## Summary ### Why? Recent sessions kept getting the same review corrections: speculative packages and adapters, homegrown wrappers, host code in the library, framework layouts, non-Bazel tooling, re-encoded IDs, internal names in a public repo, separate CI workflows, and RFCs that describe discussion rather than main. Autoreview also never ran its architecture or correctness lenses on TypeScript, because `.ts`/`.tsx` files classified as `other`. One such RFC already exists: queue-scoped decimal IDs shipped (#770, #804), but the decision still lived in a standalone "current vs proposed" RFC. ### What? - `AGENTS.md`: new **Design Defaults** section, aligned with the web UI RFC (#810); CI credential and workflow rules; naming, RFCs-describe-main, and concise-docs bullets; ask before splitting a large change into a stack; local run steps in the Test Plan. - Autoreview `review-scope.py`: new `web` kind (`.ts`, `.tsx`, `.js`, `.css`; `*.test.*` as tests), and `internal-reference` and `new-workflow` smells. - Autoreview `review.md` / `lenses.md`: route `web` to all code lenses; treat unneeded added surface as should-fix; add checks for each design default and for RFCs that diverge from main; sweep commit messages for internal names; skip data-migration findings for OSS deployments. - RFCs: add a **Resource IDs** section to `doc/rfc/submitqueue/workflow.md`, delete `doc/rfc/scoped-resource-ids.md` and its index entry, and fix stale ID text in the history, list, and Stovepipe workflow RFCs. ## Test Plan ✅ `bazel test //.agents/skills/autoreview/scripts:all` ✅ `bazel test //tool/docsite:site_test` (strict link check) ✅ `make fmt` leaves the tree unchanged
behinddwalls
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2026
…n's design ## Summary ### Why? Recent sessions kept getting the same review corrections: speculative packages and adapters, homegrown wrappers, host code in the library, framework layouts, non-Bazel tooling, re-encoded IDs, internal names in a public repo, separate CI workflows, and RFCs that describe discussion rather than main. Autoreview also never ran its architecture or correctness lenses on TypeScript, because `.ts`/`.tsx` files classified as `other`. One such RFC already exists: queue-scoped decimal IDs shipped (#770, #804), but the decision still lived in a standalone "current vs proposed" RFC. ### What? - `AGENTS.md`: new **Design Defaults** section, aligned with the web UI RFC (#810); CI credential and workflow rules; naming, RFCs-describe-main, and concise-docs bullets; ask before splitting a large change into a stack; local run steps in the Test Plan. - Autoreview `review-scope.py`: new `web` kind (`.ts`, `.tsx`, `.js`, `.css`; `*.test.*` as tests), and `internal-reference` and `new-workflow` smells. - Autoreview `review.md` / `lenses.md`: route `web` to all code lenses; treat unneeded added surface as should-fix; add checks for each design default and for RFCs that diverge from main; sweep commit messages for internal names; skip data-migration findings for OSS deployments. - RFCs: add a **Resource IDs** section to `doc/rfc/submitqueue/workflow.md`, delete `doc/rfc/scoped-resource-ids.md` and its index entry, fix stale ID text in the history and Stovepipe workflow RFCs, delete the superseded SubmitQueue `list-api.md` proposal (shipped as `status-list-api.md`), and describe the implemented Stovepipe List API as current rather than proposed. ## Test Plan ✅ `bazel test //.agents/skills/autoreview/scripts:all` ✅ `bazel test //tool/docsite:site_test` (strict link check) ✅ `make fmt` leaves the tree unchanged
behinddwalls
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2026
…n's design ## Summary ### Why? Recent sessions kept getting the same review corrections: speculative packages and adapters, homegrown wrappers, host code in the library, framework layouts, non-Bazel tooling, re-encoded IDs, internal names in a public repo, separate CI workflows, and RFCs that describe discussion rather than main. Autoreview also never ran its architecture or correctness lenses on TypeScript, because `.ts`/`.tsx` files classified as `other`. One such RFC already exists: queue-scoped decimal IDs shipped (#770, #804), but the decision still lived in a standalone "current vs proposed" RFC. ### What? - `AGENTS.md`: new **Design Defaults** section, aligned with the web UI RFC (#810); CI credential and workflow rules; naming, RFCs-describe-main, and concise-docs bullets; ask before splitting a large change into a stack; local run steps in the Test Plan. - Autoreview `review-scope.py`: new `web` kind (`.ts`, `.tsx`, `.js`, `.css`; `*.test.*` as tests), and `internal-reference` and `new-workflow` smells. - Autoreview `review.md` / `lenses.md`: route `web` to all code lenses; treat unneeded added surface as should-fix; add checks for each design default and for RFCs that diverge from main; sweep commit messages for internal names; skip data-migration findings for OSS deployments. - RFCs: add a **Resource IDs** section to `doc/rfc/submitqueue/workflow.md`, delete `doc/rfc/scoped-resource-ids.md` and its index entry, fix stale ID text in the history and Stovepipe workflow RFCs, delete the superseded SubmitQueue `list-api.md` proposal (shipped as `status-list-api.md`), and describe the implemented Stovepipe List API as current rather than proposed. ## Test Plan ✅ `bazel test //.agents/skills/autoreview/scripts:all` ✅ `bazel test //tool/docsite:site_test` (strict link check) ✅ `make fmt` leaves the tree unchanged
behinddwalls
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2026
…n's design ## Summary ### Why? Recent sessions kept getting the same review corrections: speculative packages and adapters, homegrown wrappers, host code in the library, framework layouts, non-Bazel tooling, re-encoded IDs, internal names in a public repo, separate CI workflows, and RFCs that describe discussion rather than main. Autoreview also never ran its architecture or correctness lenses on TypeScript, because `.ts`/`.tsx` files classified as `other`. One such RFC already exists: queue-scoped decimal IDs shipped (#770, #804), but the decision still lived in a standalone "current vs proposed" RFC. ### What? - `AGENTS.md`: new **Design Defaults** section, aligned with the web UI RFC (#810); CI credential and workflow rules; naming, RFCs-describe-main, and concise-docs bullets; ask before splitting a large change into a stack; local run steps in the Test Plan. - Autoreview `review-scope.py`: new `web` kind (`.ts`, `.tsx`, `.js`, `.css`; `*.test.*` as tests), and `internal-reference` and `new-workflow` smells. - Autoreview dispatch: the parent runs a planner, one lens reviewer per assignment in parallel, and a consolidator, because subagents cannot start their own. Committed targets are reviewed in a clean detached worktree so local edits never skip checks, and every readable changed file must appear in some reviewer's Read list or the report marks it unreviewed. - Autoreview `review.md` / `lenses.md`: route `web` to all code lenses; treat unneeded added surface as should-fix; add checks for each design default and for RFCs that diverge from main; sweep commit messages for internal names; skip data-migration findings for OSS deployments. - RFCs: add a **Resource IDs** section to `doc/rfc/submitqueue/workflow.md`, delete `doc/rfc/scoped-resource-ids.md` and its index entry, fix stale ID text in the history and Stovepipe workflow RFCs, delete the superseded SubmitQueue `list-api.md` proposal (shipped as `status-list-api.md`), and describe the implemented Stovepipe List API as current rather than proposed. ## Test Plan ✅ `bazel test //.agents/skills/autoreview/scripts:all` ✅ `bazel test //tool/docsite:site_test` (strict link check) ✅ `make fmt` leaves the tree unchanged
behinddwalls
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2026
…n's design ## Summary ### Why? Recent sessions kept getting the same review corrections: speculative packages and adapters, homegrown wrappers, host code in the library, framework layouts, non-Bazel tooling, re-encoded IDs, internal names in a public repo, separate CI workflows, and RFCs that describe discussion rather than main. Autoreview also never ran its architecture or correctness lenses on TypeScript, because `.ts`/`.tsx` files classified as `other`. One such RFC already exists: queue-scoped decimal IDs shipped (#770, #804), but the decision still lived in a standalone "current vs proposed" RFC. ### What? - `AGENTS.md`: new **Design Defaults** section, aligned with the web UI RFC (#810); CI credential and workflow rules; naming, RFCs-describe-main, and concise-docs bullets; ask before splitting a large change into a stack; local run steps in the Test Plan. - Autoreview `review-scope.py`: new `web` kind (`.ts`, `.tsx`, `.js`, `.css`; `*.test.*` as tests), and `internal-reference` and `new-workflow` smells. - Autoreview dispatch: the parent runs a planner, one lens reviewer per assignment in parallel, and a consolidator, because subagents cannot start their own. Committed targets are reviewed in a clean detached worktree so local edits never skip checks, and every readable changed file must appear in some reviewer's Read list or the report marks it unreviewed. - Autoreview `review.md` / `lenses.md`: route `web` to all code lenses; treat unneeded added surface as should-fix; add checks for each design default and for RFCs that diverge from main; sweep commit messages for internal names; skip data-migration findings for OSS deployments. - RFCs: add a **Resource IDs** section to `doc/rfc/submitqueue/workflow.md`, delete `doc/rfc/scoped-resource-ids.md` and its index entry, fix stale ID text in the history and Stovepipe workflow RFCs, delete the superseded SubmitQueue `list-api.md` proposal (shipped as `status-list-api.md`), and describe the implemented Stovepipe List API as current rather than proposed. ## Test Plan ✅ `bazel test //.agents/skills/autoreview/scripts:all` ✅ `bazel test //tool/docsite:site_test` (strict link check) ✅ `make fmt` leaves the tree unchanged
behinddwalls
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2026
…n's design ## Summary ### Why? Recent sessions kept getting the same review corrections: speculative packages and adapters, homegrown wrappers, host code in the library, framework layouts, non-Bazel tooling, re-encoded IDs, internal names in a public repo, separate CI workflows, and RFCs that describe discussion rather than main. Autoreview also never ran its architecture or correctness lenses on TypeScript, because `.ts`/`.tsx` files classified as `other`. One such RFC already exists: queue-scoped decimal IDs shipped (#770, #804), but the decision still lived in a standalone "current vs proposed" RFC. ### What? - `AGENTS.md`: new **Design Defaults** section, aligned with the web UI RFC (#810); CI credential and workflow rules; naming, RFCs-describe-main, and concise-docs bullets; ask before splitting a large change into a stack; local run steps in the Test Plan. - Autoreview `review-scope.py`: new `web` kind (`.ts`, `.tsx`, `.js`, `.css`; `*.test.*` as tests), and `internal-reference` and `new-workflow` smells. - Autoreview dispatch: the parent runs a planner, one lens reviewer per assignment in parallel, and a consolidator, because subagents cannot start their own. Committed targets are reviewed in a clean detached worktree so local edits never skip checks, and every readable changed file must appear in some reviewer's Read list or the report marks it unreviewed. Coverage is counted from Read/Partial/Unread buckets rather than judged, and every finding must be re-opened at its cited line before it is admitted, with a recheck log in the report. - Autoreview `review.md` / `lenses.md`: route `web` to all code lenses; treat unneeded added surface as should-fix; add checks for each design default and for RFCs that diverge from main; sweep commit messages for internal names; skip data-migration findings for OSS deployments. - RFCs: add a **Resource IDs** section to `doc/rfc/submitqueue/workflow.md`, delete `doc/rfc/scoped-resource-ids.md` and its index entry, fix stale ID text in the history and Stovepipe workflow RFCs, delete the superseded SubmitQueue `list-api.md` proposal (shipped as `status-list-api.md`), and describe the implemented Stovepipe List API as current rather than proposed. ## Test Plan ✅ `bazel test //.agents/skills/autoreview/scripts:all` ✅ `bazel test //tool/docsite:site_test` (strict link check) ✅ `make fmt` leaves the tree unchanged
This branch was previously deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The decimal-ID rollout is complete, so the temporary comparison workaround from #778 can be retired. Resource-ID comparisons now accept only canonical positive decimal IDs, compare them numerically, and reject legacy prefixed IDs.
Updates the comparison contracts and regression tests to cover legacy-ID rejection, including ingestion without publication and bookmark updates.
Validation
make lint,make check-tidy,make check-gazelle, andgit diff --checkpassed.aifx verifypassed review and artifact checks; generic Go lint failed without reporting issues, and coverage could not run because it expects a monorepo.arcconfigfile.Generated by the 🪄 pr-create skill in devexp-agent-marketplace