Skip to content

[bot] Merge master/0f69236e into rel/dev - #1854

Merged
yenkins-admin merged 2 commits into
rel/devfrom
snapshot-master-0f69236e-to-rel/dev
Oct 7, 2026
Merged

yenkins-admin merged 2 commits into
rel/devfrom
snapshot-master-0f69236e-to-rel/dev

Conversation

@yenkins-admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Automated PR to perform merge from master into rel/dev with changes up to 0f69236 (created by https://github.com/gooddata/gooddata-python-sdk/actions/runs/37587827818).

tychtjan and others added 2 commits October 7, 2026 09:23
Langfuse v4 cannot add a label to an observation after it is created:
the trace-create ingestion event stops working on 2026-11-16 and no
endpoint updates an existing observation. A caller that wants its
gen-ai traces grouped by combo or CI run therefore has to send the
label with the request.

ChatClient now reads GOODDATA_EVAL_TRACE_LABELS (key=value pairs,
comma-separated) and sends them as a W3C baggage header on every chat
request: each label as langfuse_metadata_<key>, and model_version also
as langfuse_version, the dimension Langfuse groups cost by. gen-ai's
Langfuse span processor copies langfuse_* baggage onto every span it
starts, so the root generation, the cost-bearing children, retries and
the title trace all carry the labels. Values are percent-encoded; OTel
decodes them with unquote_plus, so '+' and spaces survive. Unset or
empty sends no header, which keeps every existing run unchanged.

Verified against gen-ai's own langfuse 4.14.4 SDK and FastAPI
instrumentation: the header this builds lands as langfuse.version and
langfuse.trace.metadata.* on both the root and the child generation.
gen-ai only keeps caller langfuse_* baggage where
genAi.langfuse.acceptCallerBaggage is on (gooddata/gdc-nas#27251).

jira: GDAI-2547
risk: low
feat(gooddata-eval): label gen-ai traces through W3C baggage
@yenkins-admin
yenkins-admin merged commit 43f654a into rel/dev Oct 7, 2026
1 check passed
@yenkins-admin
yenkins-admin deleted the snapshot-master-0f69236e-to-rel/dev branch October 7, 2026 07:31
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 6f4aae3c-ccce-495a-bc8a-d833a2391f7a

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
  • Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.19%. Comparing base (72655a2) to head (0f69236).
⚠️ Report is 605 commits behind head on rel/dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           rel/dev    #1854      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    84.17%   84.19%   +0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          333      333              
  Lines        23235    23257      +22     
===========================================
+ Hits         19559    19581      +22     
  Misses        3676     3676              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants